Would You Pay For a Google SEO Website Analysis Report?

Posted: March 21st, 2010 | Author: author | Filed under: Web Marketing | Tags: , , , , , | No Comments »

I have an idea which I believe could increase the profits of Google by one hundred percent, they could start to offer a website review or website analysis service. This is where a webmaster could pay a certain amount of money for somebody who works at Google to write them a report explaining where they are going wrong, SEO wise and web promotion wise, and what steps they could take to improve their search engine ranking. I would most certainly pay for this form of advice – so would you?

I believe that many people would, why wouldn’t they? I am fairly sure that the majority of webmasters would like to gain extra visitors to their sites; am I wrong? I suppose you could say that you can already seek the services of an SEO expert but in truth we all know that there are very few of these. The “experts” that are proven charge a huge amount of money, money which Google could surely do with.

In my opinion and experience of the SEO market place, there are few people you can trust, the majority of the people who work in this industry are very slow, work wise, are poor communicators and offer very poor customer service. Let’s face it Google are the ones who are best placed to advise us to where we can improve and I for one would be happy to pay into four figures for such advice. Whether you have a stuttering treatment website or a site offering cheap holidays I am sure that you would benefit from such a website analysis report.

The information within the report could include sites that are linking to you or the sites which your site is linking to and which ones Google feels are having a detrimental affect on your overall search engine ranking. The report could also confirm whether Google think you are purchasing backward links and about other items that may be causing them concern. Excessive reciprocal links or keyword stuffing on various pages.

Related Products:


Comments are closed.